You're right, Newfie, that if what works for me works, that's cool. I feel the same way for others.....whether they use a Stihl, Homelite or whatever.
I do have a question for you, though....what do you consider "real hours on a saw" in your comment above? I certainly am no lightweight on using my Poulans and have given them more than their share of work over the past number of years and they still work as well as ever. I know I've gone out in the woods here and cut a full truckload of wood in around an hour with my Poulans. That includes cutting, limbing, blocking, and loading the wood in the truck, and a fullsize pickup at that...though not ranked, just tossed in, just heaping enough to not fall off.
What gets me is people knocking Poulans and saying they are nothing but cr@p. Depends on your usage, I guess. If I only needed a saw a couple days, or trees, a year, then who cares.....any old saw should do. Poulan markets the Wildthing and others to the consumer market, indeed....and it can well live up to that. To say they are mere cr@p isn't constructive....as it depends on what you're talking about for usage. If a person is going to get into the tree cutting business for a living, no, a small Poulan would be a joke...so would most any other "consumer" saw. When people just knock Poulan or any other consumer brand as junk, they are pretty much saying that anyone who buys them is stupid. Same if I were to say that all Fords are
[email protected]'m insulting those who like that brand. It all comes down to usage, and if a person indeed needs "industrial strength" then one of the pro brands is definitely the thing to do. For consumer usage, which is exactly what Poulan markets to mainly, their saws can well serve that market and then some. As I've noted, I probably cut a considerably greater amount of wood than the "average homeowner" and have done so consistently for the past 6 or so years with Poulans. (and I've tried out Macs, homelites and other saws over the years and still prefer my Poulans!). My point is that these saws aren't necessarily the cr@p that many blast them as. For the average homeowner a Stihl or Husky is actually "an overpriced waste". Seriously......why should someone pay $300-400 just to cut a tree or two a year? When a Poulan or whatever could do them just as well. From my experience with Poulans, they can handle a LOT more than that, so if homeowners are just given the hype that they should buy only the big names, well, I could argue it's a disservice to "oversell" them on that. It's like selling someone a 1 ton 4wd pickup when all they need is a Ford Ranger type truck. Same argument in reverse, but it's all relative.
You, and others can say what you like about Poulans, but I am know, from experience(and not casual mind you!), that they can more than do their job! To cut them down is just as much a misnomer as it is for me to call Stihl's and Husky's overpriced and unnecessary for the majority of people(which is true, as most people don't NEED a heavy duty saw!). If you're happy with your husky or stihl, great, I'm glad. I am not out to tell you to ditch it and get a Poulan. Just that Poulan is worthy of more respect than they've been given in this thread for sure.