Wiseco Piston Pics and Comments

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Pop-up

I'd expect that a lot of people would discount the wristpin gap issue if the piston came with a pop-up. With the pop-up, they would probably be willing to make some compromises (such as a longer bearing) in order to have a high compression piston.

Is there any feedback on why there isn't a pop-up/high compression piston?
 
Not enough demand, we are a very small peice of the pie.:D

Ya, plus I'm wondering, how it would work for every saw, since some can be slightly different. If your shooting for squish to within a couple of thou. I'm sure some saw can differ that much easy. Better off to make the popup yourself.
 
Ya, plus I'm wondering, how it would work for every saw, since some can be slightly different. If your shooting for squish to within a couple of thou. I'm sure some saw can differ that much easy. Better off to make the popup yourself.

Yup, pop ups are "one of a kind" so to speak. The same one won't work in a different saw unless they(bases and squish band) are measured and machined accordingly.
 
Looking at the pic Brad posted, that is a lot of bearing floating to and fro. The side loads on the small rod end cant be good. If there was a way to keep the bearing in the center of the rod other than spacers, no big deal. But with the current piston configuration, that isnt possible.
 
There is no mention of the wrist pin bearing anywhere in that thread. No bearing pictured with the piston kit either.

You are correct Brad.
i forgot to put the bearing in the photo.
The bearing is not part of the Wiseco piston
kit. I had to buy them seperate from Wiseco
and supply them with every kit.

The width between the pin bosses is in there
machining process and can't make that dimension
as narrow as the stock piston. Not sure why.
I wasn't happy with that so they did the research
and found a bearing to make up the addition clearance.
The cage of the bearing actually a bit wider and not the
needles so the needles are still completely in the rod.


Lee
 
You are correct Brad.
i forgot to put the bearing in the photo.
The bearing is not part of the Wiseco piston
kit. I had to buy them seperate from Wiseco
and supply them with every kit.

The width between the pin bosses is in there
machining process and can't make that dimension
as narrow as the stock piston. Not sure why.
I wasn't happy with that so they did the research
and found a bearing to make up the addition clearance.
The cage of the bearing actually a bit wider and not the
needles so the needles are still completely in the rod.


Lee

Thanks Lee.
 
Looking at the pic Brad posted, that is a lot of bearing floating to and fro. The side loads on the small rod end cant be good. If there was a way to keep the bearing in the center of the rod other than spacers, no big deal. But with the current piston configuration, that isnt possible.

Who would spend $130-140 on a piston then have to get spacers machined? Even with spacers, will these pistons go 1000-2000 hours with all that flop? Sounds retarded to me but I'll stick with Stihl and Mahle.:rock:
 
Looking at the pic Brad posted, that is a lot of bearing floating to and fro. The side loads on the small rod end cant be good. If there was a way to keep the bearing in the center of the rod other than spacers, no big deal. But with the current piston configuration, that isnt possible.

First of all, I'm not real happy about this either. But the engineers say it's OK. I'm going to run it initially with the OEM bearing. I do intend to buy the wider B1015 bearing though. That'll give me a chance to go back in there after running it with the OEM bearing.

Do remeber that the rod will never be off to the side like I posted. It will be centered as in the pic below.

793103488_Yn6hx-M.jpg
 
First of all, I'm not real happy about this either. But the engineers say it's OK. I'm going to run it initially with the OEM bearing. I do intend to buy the wider B1015 bearing though. That'll give me a chance to go back in there after running it with the OEM bearing.

Do remeber that the rod will never be off to the side like I posted. It will be centered as in the pic below.

793103488_Yn6hx-M.jpg


Isnt there side to side movement of the rod on the crank? Wont that allow the rod to float to the side?
 
Who would spend $130-140 on a piston then have to get spacers machined? Even with spacers, will these pistons go 1000-2000 hours with all that flop? Sounds retarded to me but I'll stick with Stihl and Mahle.:rock:

The Homelite Super 2100 uses spacers
from the factory and they had no problems.


Lee
 
The Homelite Super 2100 uses spacers
from the factory and they had no problems.


Lee

Good point but Homelite nor Mac make saws worth a crap "anymore". I know they were great saws for their time era. Maybe it worked for them but why doesn't Stihl, Dolmar or husqvarna use these methods today? I just don't see any advantages.....
 
Back
Top