porsche965
Addicted to ArboristSite
What would you compare a 390xp to? Exactly?
And I sure am not your son. Pops.
And I sure am not your son. Pops.
Well you can't compare it to a bigger saw that's for sure. But by the sound of it your pro stihl.
Brad had one that was a blubbering mess. IIRC he found out what was wrong with it?Mostly referring to the early production runs. I ran a few that were total dogs. I also thought you said the 661 was a mess. At least that's what I remember you saying, I could be wrong.
I would ask if the system works so well, why is Brad and others, looking to run a normal carb on the 661?[emoji9] Again the 661 I ran was very stout, had a great feel, build quality and so on. But I'm not sure about it's fuel management system.
I call it as I see it.
Brad had one that was a blubbering mess. IIRC he found out what was wrong with it?
It doesn't take long to get a good idea of how a saw runs or handles. As I said the 661 is a fine saw, but I'd wait a few years to buy one. I honestly don't care to be a beta tester, like many of the early 550/562 owners.
I also don't many retired people that work all day running saws.
I think the 390 vs 661 argument needs to be put to bed until the AT 90cc husky arrives..if it follows the trend its most likely gonna edge out the 661 in overall speed.
I THINK I agree lol. Love my Huskies and Stihls.
No, because I dont own a 661.Back to the oil testing. I do have a question regarding the outcome of the testing that Red Bull will do.
Will anyone change their current use of whatever oil or ratio depending upon the outcome of this guy, Red Bull's hard work and expense?
You're insane.
No, because I dont own a 661.
See my edit.I told Red Bull this. At this point, with THIS answer, Red Bull should stop his testing. What for?
Enter your email address to join: