okay. for you, my shorthand-challenged friend, i will modify my previous request to more accurately reflect the fullest usage of the english language.
in your opinion, following the precept of "if no modified pixels are presented as evidence the referenced deed did not, in fact, occur", would it be possible to provide a series of modified pixels that would more-or-less accurately represent a facsimilie of the previously noted portion of the fuel tank wherein the former owner attempted to affect a repair using the apparently incorrect chemical formulation of fiberglass?
btw, still like that saw. hate to see you part it out. preciate it.