Kneejerk Bombas
ArboristSite King
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2001
- Messages
- 36,971
- Reaction score
- 9,983
I have run about 5 of the little Echos into the ground, took about two years. I still have all my Stihls and Huskys. I have an 020 with more hours on it than all 5 of my Echos put together.16gauge said:What is your basis for this statement? Have you run a stilh ms200t for a hundred hours and an echo 340 for 200 hours. Oopps. Your post must be based on conjecture. I'll be waiting many months for the experience to temper the conjecture about these climbing saws. In the mean time, tell me what other echos are really bad saws. Thanks for your responses...ahead of time.
The big difference is the Echos are "throw away" saws. If an $80 part fails you throw it away. With a pro tool, you fix it.
Don't get me wrong about the Echos, they are good saws. I rate them as kind of in between a pro saw and a homeowner saw. The Stihl and Husky saw models mentioned are pro saws (both Stihl and Husky make homeowner saws).
If you use your saws every day, you'll be disappointed in the Echo. The biggest thing is the power. If you are a weekend warrior, it would probably be a great fit. If you go out to cut for 1/2 hour, once a month, look at the poulans or some other $100-$200 saw.
You can't rate a saw by looking at a spec chart. You need to run them for a while.
I personally like the Huskys because of the power band and the anti-vibration. The throttle response is right on and the saw is so smooth to operate. It's really a pleasure. The newer models are improved, so if you haven't tried on in a while, you might be surprised.