porsche965
Addicted to ArboristSite
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't both AT and MT sample rpm and throttle position and adjust accordingly?
Be nice if they had one more input like a o2 sensor.
Or a pyometer.
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't both AT and MT sample rpm and throttle position and adjust accordingly?
Be nice if they had one more input like a o2 sensor.
Do "those guys" own M-tronic type systems? Or fully modded M-tronic saws?
I fully trust those engineers with the AT and M-Tronic systems better than myself with that little orange driver.
How many out there go to great lengths to buy an old truck or car with a carburetor?
Do "those guys" own M-tronic type systems? Or fully modded M-tronic saws?
I fully trust those engineers with the AT and M-Tronic systems better than myself with that little orange driver.
How many out there go to great lengths to buy an old truck or car with a carburetor?
I've never a problem with AT or Mtronics thus far in ported saws.
Trusting in the process at this point.
I'm sure it adjusts for ambient conditions such as temperature but I wonder if it can adjust for altitude?Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't both AT and MT sample rpm and throttle position and adjust accordingly?
Be nice if they had one more input like a o2 sensor.
If you think about it, any system that adjusts for temperature would also adjust for altitude as they have a simular effect on tuning. Forget about temp, altitude, humidity, etc. AT doesnt care. It's just holding rpm to a set point in relationship to throttle position. Unless my understanding of the system is way off.I'm sure it adjusts for ambient conditions such as temperature but I wonder if it can adjust for altitude?
That's called a MS441. The early ones had no rev limiter.What would be a cool is a strato saw with no rev limiter and a tunable carb....
Tunable carb too?That's called a MS441. The early ones had no rev limiter.
That's strange it only samples one parameter.MTronic simply samples RPMs and adjust the H needle accordingly. It'll pull a little, then see how that affects RPMs, and vice versa. By this manner, it accounts for all conditions, but it fuel, temperature, altitude, porting, muffler mod, etc.
Yes, tuneable carb. Stock they weren't as strong as the MS441C. After porting, they ran fantastic, just as a MS441C does.Tunable carb too?
Wasn't that saw a dog?
How about the early MS261. I do remember you saying you ran into it somewhere "north of 15,000 RPM", but, for all practical purposes, this does not count for much since it shouldn't come into play?!That's called a MS441. The early ones had no rev limiter.
So the viscosity is the variable in which the M-tronic cannot compensate for ? This would explain a lot if so.
What if Stihl deliberately made their saws to run best on Ultra @ 50:1? Talk about a marketing coo. That would make Amsoil look pretty much like beginners lol.
So an oil with a profile like Ultra would produce the best results performance wise? Viscosity included?
I said this 100 pages back...We are still dealing with bad information on this whole oil test BS. I know others want to say this, but don't want to cause an uproar. A lot has been said behind the smoke and mirrors. Until the test is preformed by someone who is competent, this meandering thread will continue.
Enter your email address to join: