This viscosity thing causing the results with H1R is non sense... the stuff is just crap oil with a track record of causing these sorts of issues.
We are still dealing with bad information on this whole oil test BS. I know others want to say this, but don't want to cause an uproar. A lot has been said behind the smoke and mirrors. Until the test is preformed by someone who is competent, this meandering thread will continue.
Gargling with too much oil,lol...You are barking up the wrong tree with that train of thought.The real smoke and mirrors is testing a stock saw with 32:1 in a video and then later testing the same saw ported with 32:1 and finding 30% gain. Test the stock saw with OE oil at 50:1 and see what the difference is when it isn't gargling with too much oil, more than it was designed to use.
That's real smoke and mirrors IMO.
We'll have no evidence of this until another oil like 800 or K2 is tested. That's why I've been pushing for that.This viscosity thing causing the results with H1R is non sense... the stuff is just crap oil with a track record of causing these sorts of issues.
Test away Andre'
I said this 100 pages back...
The real smoke and mirrors is testing a stock saw with 32:1 in a video and then later testing the same saw ported with 32:1 and finding 30% gain. Test the stock saw with OE oil at 50:1 and see what the difference is when it isn't gargling with too much oil, more than it was designed to use.
That's real smoke and mirrors IMO.
These so called tests are a circle jerk.. many people have noticed the tuning issues and it's noted in the ultralight test posted in this thread many pages back. The issue is real and exists.We'll have no evidence of this until another oil like 800 or K2 is tested. That's why I've been pushing for that.
OK, Red Bull has spent a lot of $ doing what everyone here seems to think is a BS test. So who is next up with their $ to test the way they think is the appropriate way to test?
Easy to sit on the sidelines. I'm ready to spend $. Anyone else?
We could raise $ from a pool of serious people that would post the closed results to only those willing to buy in and choose a testing agent and buy the saws, chains, oils, etc. Those not interested in spending $ can sit in the dark and wonder and armchair all they want. Like most of us are doing here now.
Let's start with $100 buy in. Any takers? I choose Andre' for the tester. Then when the results are posted he can feel what it is like to have his test called BS. We need one other willing to verify results. Those testing get a free pass of the buy in. Heck, let's go $200. For that we can buy some nice saws to run this test. Sell them off when finished and disperse the funds. Oils, chains, all the expenses we have enjoyed ONE guy paying for like Red Bull now can be shared with everyone.
Suggestions?
If you have outcut ported saws Andre with stock saws on 32:1 please tell me the porters you have beat so I don't waste my $
To save embarrassment send me a PM Andre' on the porters not to use. 30% as claimed from a ported saw is a lot to beat by a stock saw. They must be really bad. Thanks.
Love to pay Chad and his Dyno to get in on this testing also.
Enter your email address to join: