Reason for open face
clearance:
Look over the Norwegian diagram for open face attached to this post.
Forget that it is a different language.
Step back a bit a try not to be so reactionary. Don't beat the piss and vinegar out of me. Breathe deep and relax.
In a forest where almost everything isn't second growth, it's 15th growth.
Where very few snags have your name on them.
Tree heights and diameters are small.
Minimal butt swell.
Birds chip with gossip pleasantly.
The Open Face cut is a reasonable compromise that affects the butt log the least. (By lowering the back-cut and having a minimal face cut for depth, this technique can waste less than a Humboldt. This is especially important in a climate with smaller timber to start with.)
Would an open face be a desirable technique to adopt in Coastal BC? Absolutely not.
Among the many reasons why not:
The open face will not work as well when wedging, the faller needs a better initial release. A deeper face to wedge the tougher trees is obvious.
The open face will waste wood, compared to the Humboldt in large butt swell timber.
The amount of time it takes to cut something that doesn't work as well. Cheeeezzz.
To the credit of the East Coast fallers I've seen. They've modified their face cuts from this drawing and go in much farther. That makes sense with their larger timber. Keep going west and one can understand why we start from a 1/3 rd in rule on undercuts.
The next reason for open face is that it can keep the hinge attached all the way through the fall. With trees generally not wanting to go as quickly with a smaller face and an hinge solid throughout the fall, they come down slower. This has a few advantages. Less breakage and just a little more time for escape.
It can also contribute to a tree hanging up, so beware of that.
The school of thought on why the back-cut is to be even with the face bottom/apex is that if the hinge is still holding, there is no need for stump shot. In fact, it may well be better than stump shot on some trees.
(Part of the reason they can 'get away' with the shallow face cuts, is that perfectly matched back-cuts are very efficient. When viewed in this light, the ridiculously small face isn't that small.)
Now, on slope, with a large butt being slammed up and down with the power to smash a log truck cab flat, does this thought process apply?
No.