dan henry modified 372xp

Arborist Forum

Help Support Arborist Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just in, I called Dennis Greffard and asked him what Dan is doing to his saws lately that is new.
Dennis says:
Dans new technology = actually doing something too the saw because to many people were getting pi$$ed off.
John
 
Originally posted by bwalker
Glens, if you go over to the first page of this thread you will see I asked with out antaganism or malice.

FWIW I think Dan isnt answering because he doesnt have a answer. Just like the RS 7900 jug/piston, the gouged out gasket...
Yes, Bwalker, you did ask nicely.  It was quite (recently) uncharacteristic for you but you did.  How about doing what he'd replied?  Did you follow up on that?  I'll bet not, but that you instead just jumped back on to the antagonist bandwagon.

I don't recall what the "RS 7900 jug/piston" is about, but I surmise you're still insinuating that Dan produced that raggedy gasket.  I don't know whether he did or didn't but will continue to disbelieve he did until shown otherwise.  I know you don't care much for him but do you really think he's that much of an idiot?  Furthermore, your statement just above makes it sound like the ball's in his court about that gasket.  What do you mean by "he doesn't have an answer for it"?  Was he ever even asked a question?

Glen
 
[Quote by Glens]

"Modified saws have merit, which I can see, but not for day-to-day use in my opinion."

What do you base your opinion on? Have you ever run a modified saw? Who modified it, if so? If not in day-to-day use then when do they have merit? Please answer in 50 words or less! Thank you. BB
 
MR Modded saw

I had a MR modded saw at a show once it seams to me the high speed screw was turned all the way in but you know those macs just so tempermental when somebody FUWKS with it
 
BB

Glens has run modded saws. He ran at least 3 of the 7 I own, when he was here helping me, he likes his Stihls and who wouldn't. I like Husky, Dolmar and others. Mine were modded by Danny Henry and two other saw builders. Get a grip on your flapping lip and take a chill pill Roxanne. Some of us accually like the saws we own. Some of us have run more than one or two brands before we pick a favorite. I guess next your going to tell me your rancher55 will run circles around my Dan Henry's or Glens Stihls?
 
my saw kicks your saws butt

Im about ready to pull out my nitro minimac and kick everybodys a$$:D
 
my 372 wants that minimac with the nitro.. me i just want the nitro.. i feel a heart attack,, a coming on..:)
 
Isn't this great how we are all getting along again?
If we're all fighting and throwing barbs at each other then neither Darin or Russ will be able to ban anyone.
In fact, lets make a comical remake of "Chainsaw Masacre".
I get to be the stunt man!
John
 
Originally posted by bwalker
.....Lucky, I am not asking for anyones port numbers. I am asking about the "new tech" that Dan has came up with pure and simple. Porting is hardley new tech. I do consider it in bad taste to ask for port numbers like certain people have done. Especially when one doesnt give credit where its due.......

I don`t think that Lucky has any problem with giving out port numbers as long as they are Ken Dunn`s, he posted them somewhere else under a different name. No matter though because Ken has been such a selfless guy with most people on this forum that he has given his numbers to most anyone who ever asked, including Dan and Dennis G. Anyone care to say that isn`t true?

Russ
 
Hi
Ben
Sorry about my wording. I guess that I should have said that the technology was new to me, not new technology.
Run a stock 999 and then run the other one and tell me what the gains are. Those saws are a pig in stock form, now it is a stronger running pig. When I delivered that saw, the owner told me it wants much slower then his Stihl 084 or 088 that came from another builder. Ed told you people it was a good saw. Did the saw get slower or did the people change?
I looked at the gasket pictures in great detail. It appears to have been made with some type of paper punch. It was supposed to come out of a running saw. Look close at the tiny impulse hole in that gasket. It looks like it was punched in with a nail or other pointed object. If that gasket was sandwiched in place, it would have blocked off that hole and the saw would not have ran. Did I make it, NO. I could make a nicer gasket with a blender. In one of the friendly emails I received from that saws owner, I was asked about a home made gasket. I did tell him that I have made base gaskets for under the barrels. I was making gaskets before you ever came into this word and I cant make one look that bad. This must be a super saw, it survived the flood and runs without an impulse hole.
Yes there are a few people that are complaining about their saws but look at the people, do you see a pattern?
Take a good look at the overall picture. My business is just like any other, you never here about the good, just the bad. I don't know of any builder in the US that has built more woods saws then I have. John Walker may have more saws out there but he has been in business for a lot longer then I have. I can say that at least 99% of the people that I built saws for are happy with them. I learned a long time ago to try to make that last 1% happy, but only to a certain point.

Glens
You have my vote for the next moderator position.
 
Hi
Here is a copy of an email that I sent out to another AS member.
I guess there is no law about copying from myself.

Mark
I don't remember ever saying that I cant stand you, I don't understand your thoughts on some issues but to each his own. You are the one that said, we are done, not me.
You lost me on the 346 carb. The carb from a 357 is a direct bolt on, nothing has to be upside down. How do you figure that you paid me to install a 357 carb on your 346? I never charged you for a 357 carb!
The 460
The weld job wasn't the problem with that muffler. That one had the two pipes out the front and I did make them to long. You had the saw in some large wood and the pipes hit the log and broke them off. I did tell you to send it back and I would replace the muffler. Then you tell me that it seized up. I also told you to send it back and I would take care of it. Did you send it back? No, you sent that saw to Dennis and he sold it. The saw never locked up. To make you happy, I gave you a 2100. Let me see, a 2100 for a bad muffler on a saw, who is taking advantage of who? Sometimes first impressions stay with us.
2100/285
This one is a long story. John did drop off 3 saws here. One was a mint 2100 and he dropped off two parts saws, that supposedly where also 2100s. I was to get the 2 parts saws for porting the nice 2100. You called me and told me to send out the mint 2100 that John had here, you told me that John gave it to you. Not be able to send out a saw that belongs to someone else, I had to here that from him, before I could ship it. He did call me and said that he offered to give you the mint 2100. He said that he really didn't want to give up the saw that his girl friend bought for him and asked me if we could make up a nice 2100 for you out of the parts saws. One of the saws turned out to be a 285 with a bad ignition and the 2100 had a bad piston and barrel. I used the 2100 engine case and to make you a saw, I did use the 285 piston and barrel. The problem was that John already told you the saw was nice. To make the saw look nice, I used my starter cover, top covers, fuel tank, clutch side cover and top handle. John kept the mint 2100. Now keep in mind that by this time, I know what happened to the 460. I actually had more in that saw then John did, but did you thank me for it, NO. You actually had the nerve to complained about a free saw!
I might have had a gasket in that saw that I made. Did it leak? NO. Because it was made, does that make it bad or wrong? NO You can buy gasket material at any parts store for that purpose. The nice part about it is that it comes in different thickness, it gives us another way to adjust the squash clearance on saws.
Yes I did weld about 3 fins back on the 357 barrel. Did they ever create a problem? NO
I have a 090 barrel here now that Ken worked on. He broke many of them off and had them welded back on. It can happen to the best of us.
I don't know if there is a problem with Ed and Cliff or EJ. I don't have a problem with any of them, they are are welcome here anytime. That last I knew was that EJ was coming here, at that time I never talked with Cliff. I have since that time had some lengthy conversations with him. The get together was open to all.
Dennis and I are friends and we have had some real interesting conversations about people and saws.
I never told Ed that you are my money bag. He did ask me one time if I had any problem getting money from you and I said you are good as gold, meaning that you always pay your bills.
Lathe
I guess you are correct in saying that I never thanked you for the lathe. I did thank the man that it belonged to. Yes you did list it on the used forum but it was not yours. Anyhow , thanks for finding me the lathe, I do appreciate it.
Yes I did charge you for the work that I performed for you, is that wrong? You have to keep in mind that I basically gave you two saws for no reason, other then to try to keep you happy.
Thanks
Dan
 
Russ
Yes Ken gave me his numbers that he was using. I consider them on the conservative side.
Later
Dan
 
Finished product. Check out the nice lines on the left over material.
 
u hang in there dan.. i pm,or emailed[i forget] u at one time,
mainly because i wanted this post to get over with..
in any case i know u didnt need my words of support .. but i wanted to givum anyway..the truth always stands the test of time.. and so it will this time.. have a good day bud..tony..
now i agree with john .. lets get a little humor an fun back on here.. after all ,the world aint just loaded down with people that give a hoot about chainsaws.. some think its a thing that wont exist in 15 yrs or so.. i say not,to that..
now yall aint suppose to start laughing
at me ,again now.. o heck go ahead..
:D
 
Originally posted by dozerdan
Russ
Yes Ken gave me his numbers that he was using. I consider them on the conservative side.
Later
Dan

I also consider them to be on the conservative side for many applications, but you and I both know that there is far more to porting than timing figures. That statement means excatly what it says, nothing more and nothing less.

Nice gasket. FWIW, I`ve been making gaskets since I was a boy and consider it routine. Even in nuke power , gaskets are routinely made and you won`t find any more stringent industry or regulatory standards because of the concern for public safety. I state this to support my position that there is nothing wrong with rolling your own when it comes to gaskets if you have the proper material and excercise the proper technique. All that being said, I wouldn`t have made a gasket like the one in question unless I was trying to mess with someone.

"the truth always stands the test of time.. and so it will this time..."

That`s more than likely true, but we haven`t seen it all yet.

Russ
 
So why was my gasket from the 2100/285 made this crude. If you could build that one why not mine.

You under-estimeted me and over estimated your work.

17466.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top